Skip to main content

TESTER PERCEPTION - PART 3

Its been a while since I have last blogged, its been hectic for one reason or another but I find myself with a bit more time so I can finish this series of blog posts.

In this post I will complete the set of posts on testers perception. This post will describe ways in which testers can change how they are interpreted. Testers can change how they are interpreted by showing how they add value by changing their behaviours.

Below are a few ways we can change how we are perceived as testers, 

1) Don't shout louder, improve your argument

Shouting louder than anyone else does not necessarily always work. We've all been there, you get quite heated in a discussion about a subject that you feel passionate about and someone else does the same and it all ends in disagreements and potentially damaged relationships. You need to think smarter. If you feel passionately about something on a project then do some research. Come up for valid reasons why you want something to be different.Try and find someone who agrees with you and work together to build a well formed argument around why this change would be good.

2) Use Socratic questioning

"The unexamined life is not worth living" - Socrates

Socratic questioning is disciplined questioning that can be used to pursue thought in many directions and purposes. This includes: 
  • to explore complex idea,
  • get to the truth of things
  • open up issues and problems
  • uncover assumption........ as well as many others. 

It is linked to critical thinking and is used for teaching to probe students thinking. It can be a useful tool for a tester as by asking the right questions. We can uncover things like:
  • Assumptions made by users and developers
  • Why a user wants a particular feature
By using this style of questioning we change how we are perceived as we can do things like  help uncover issues before code is written as well as catch bugs early If a developer or user has made the wrong assumption. 

3) Hold Lunch for Learnings

Lunch for learnings are a great way (in an informal) setting of getting people together and doing an info share about a particular topic. You could do a session on an aspect of testing that the audience don't know about. If your development team think that testing is just a matter of writing you tests cases in Excel with detailed steps, then do a lunch for learning on Exploratory testing. These kind of sessions will educate other people in your business about testing and this in turn can help change their perceptions about what you do. Hopefully some people will want to know more and this in turn could develop into relationships that will help the testing process going forward.

If you are having trouble getting people to attend, just offer Pizza that always seems to work, :)

4) Pair up with a developer

Just because as a tester you may not be able to code does not mean you cannot be a valuable asset to a developer. To foster this a good idea is to try and pair with a developer whist they are writing the code. If possible they can talk you through what they are doing and you can question this. This questioning could be something simple like "Wouldn't that be useful to log that out put?" or something that could mitigate the risk of a bug  like "What if the users mobile phones loses signal when they enter data on that screen?"

This pairing will soon help the developer to realise that you input is vital to help develop an application with quality ingrained in it. 

Not all developer are willing to do this but you should start small by maybe just asking a quick question about the code in passing then slowly trying to get some time with them.

5) Advocate building quality into the product from the start

To do this you need to encourage certain practices into the development process. This may be more of a company culture 'thing' but that does not mean that you cannot be an advocate for it. This could include doing things such as:
  • Getting involved in sprint planning
  • Sitting in on code design sessions
  • Helping to write user stories
the list goes on.....but by doing some of these you can demonstrate value by contributing and highlighting testing aspects that may not of been thought of. As a tester you probably have more experience than most in the UI (If there is one) and the overall functionality of the system, so you are 
full of useful knowledge that can be tapped into to help build quality in

Summary
Now the above points are just a few ways that you can add value which in turn can change how you are perceived as a person and a tester. There are more things you can do and some of these will be things that are less general and more specific to your company. 

It may be that you already feel valued and you are happy with how others perceive you, and if so keep doing what you are doing. However if you do not then you need to take some action to rectify it. We spend most of our lives with our work colleges and feeling appreciated and feeling like you are a valued contributor can make your days a lot more enjoyable. 






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Testing and Mindfulness

How aware are you? Do you live in the here and now or is your mind always somewhere else? This blog post is about Mindfulness. Mindfulness is a simple meditation and is defined as (According to Wikipedia): "The intentional, accepting and non-judgemental focus of one's attention on the emotions, thoughts and sensations occurring in the present moment" Now Mindfulness has become more popular in the west in recent years as it has shown to have benefits for people who are suffering from Depression and Anxiety. It has been around for a while and is often thought to of originated from Buddhism and some people believe it started thousands of years ago. Now modern life is hectic and I’m sure we all have lots of things going on in our lives that keep our Brains busy and trying to focus on one thing at a time can be a challenge. I can't remember the number of times I've been doing something and my mind is somewhere else entirely. Mindfuln...

How to deal with external data formats?

This blog post is in response to Challenge 7 of the #GivenWhenThenWithStyle blog post series with Gojko Adzic  You can see what the challenge is here: https://specflow.org/blog/how-to-deal-with-external-data-formats-givenwhenthenwithstyle/ Having the message format in the test would  (as mentioned in the challenge) look terrible and would be difficult to understand.  If I was to rewrite this scenario I would do something like the following: 1) Write a test that tests the validity of the payment message. So something like Scenario : payment message validity Given an account EE382200221020145685 has a balance When the system receives a payment message Then the payment message is valid.  I would store the actual payment message in another file as not to clutter the scenario file and this message would be passed into the test in the When line. The Then part of the test could cover various areas, such as: - All the correct tags are present  - The xml is valid 2) I wo...

Benchmarking in C# - Simple Job attribute

In this post I am going to continue my servies on BenchMarkDotNet and I will explain what the various parameters do that are present in the simplejob attribute.  Now I say all....... the documentation is not great so I will explain what 3 out of the 4 do :) So If you remember in my previous post I had a MyFirstBenchmark class which contained the details about the benchmark test that I wanted to run. In this class there is an attribute called SimpleJob and this attribute contains a few parameters that can be configured when you run a test.  By default BenchMarkDotNet will choose the number of iterations that will return the best precision. However, using the simplejob attribute allows you to quickly get a set of statistics. Below is how my test was setup: Now as you can see I had the following parameters in the SimpleJob attribute: launchCount - This parameter allows you to define how many times the benchmarking test is run warmupCount ...